Book a demo
To see exactly how we can help you drive your company in the right direction, book a demo with an expert.

If you've spent the last 12 months feeling like every consulting peer is further ahead on AI than you are... take a breath. They aren't. They're just posting about it.
The honest version of where the market sits , told by someone who's done sales enablement for a quarter of a century, is much messier - but much more solvable - than your LinkedIn feed suggests.
Dannii Mathers is a Go-To-Market Consultant at SBR Consulting, specialising in AI enablement. She joined CMap's ConCon26 to open the day with a session on prospecting, pitching and closing in the AI era.
What she shared was less about new tools and more about the unglamorous order of operations that separates firms getting compounding value out of AI from the firms burning the cycle.
Most leaders Dannii speaks to walk in convinced everyone else is ahead. The data says otherwise.
Most firms are in the same place: early, uneven, and unsure.
The boutique firm advantage is real, though. There's less legacy, fewer instances of the same broken CRM, and more permission to start cleanly.
Most people are kind of in the same area. You can certainly clean your data far easier than somebody who's got five instances of Salesforce.
For 25 years, consulting firms got away with patchy CRM hygiene because the outcome - revenue - papered over the inputs.
That deal is off. The moment AI sits on top of your sales motion, every gap in your data degrades the output.
Hiding behind bad data is no longer feasible if you want to get the impact from AI.
The single biggest visible change in consulting outreach this year AI volume, not AI qulality.
Mediocre prospecting has gone industrial. That's terrible news if your firm tries to compete on volume... but it's an unbelievable opening if you compete on craft.
What we're seeing now is the scale of mass rubbish. Whereas before people would send really bad emails and you'd get a few, now we're scaling that poorer quality.
AI was supposed to give time back. And yet the senior people doing it well are working harder than ever.
That's not a failure of AI. It's the design and evaluation cost that always shows up when a craft compounds.
I'm actually working more hours and harder than I've ever worked before — because I'm trying to keep on top of AI. That is a full-time job in itself.
If 60% of the buyer journey is already happening agent-to-agent, the human moment your firm gets has to be radically higher quality.
Dannii's frame is simple: stop creating selling environments. Start creating buying environments.
What do you want them to know? How do you want them to feel? What do you want them to do? Think that way very quickly when you're into that mode, and you'll have a better opportunity of connecting with your clients.
So, having the most AI tools won't be what gets you ahead in the next three years. But fixing your data, naming your process, and freeing your best humans to do the parts of the job machines can't will.
Dannii's session was a useful reset for anyone catastrophising about AI in BD. The opportunity is real. The order of operations is unsexy. Start there.
