How boutique consultancies are actually beating the big firms in 2026

If you run a boutique consulting firm, you've probably had two versions of the same conversation in the last six months.

Version one: this is the best time ever to run a small consultancy.

Version two: the floor is moving and we're not sure what's underneath it. Both are true. The question is which one you're going to act on.

At ConCon26, we sat with two people who have a panoramic view of that floor:

Christian Barnard is COO of Kung Fu AI, the Austin-based AI consulting firm that almost doubled revenue last year without doubling cost.

Professor Joe O'Mahoney runs Equity Sherpa, advising boutique consulting firms maximising equity value pre-sale or pre-PE, and has spent 20 years researching the industry.

They came in with different vantage points and ended up converging on the same answer. Here are five key takeaways:

‍

1. The structural advantage of big firms is genuinely eroding

This isn't the dreaded LinkedIn hot take. Christian opened with hard evidence: McKinsey cutting roughly 10% of headcount, public-facing AI as the rationale, juniors compressed out of every research and synthesis workflow.

Joe added the long-form: boutiques have outgrown the Big Four and MBB for 20 years. AI is accelerating a trend rather than creating one.

"The operating model is fundamentally different. McKinsey just cut roughly 5,000 jobs. The publicly stated reason was AI tools. The nimbleness of boutiques is why you see boutique growth rates rising while large consultancies are contracting."

• Stop benchmarking your firm against the big firms' old playbook - it's already obsolete on their end

• Look at where you can compress delivery cycles from quarters to weeks

• Make senior people who are fast & outcome-led your firm's structural sales weapon

‍

2. The new winning engagement: outcomes, senior people, speed

Christian was specific about what's actually winning right now. Three components, all things a small firm is structurally better at than a global partnership.

"The engagements I see winning right now are the ones that map fees to measurable outcomes, put senior people on the work, and have the ability to go fast and iterate. They deliver something real and tangible that delivers ROI."

• Audit your top engagements - are fees mapped to outcomes, or hours?

• Cut the days-to-decision time on your proposals

• Put senior people on the work, not just on the pitch

‍

3. ICP squared - the discipline that drove the doubling

Christian's single biggest growth lever was discipline, not AI. They "sharpened ICP until it hurt", then layered on the project type - what kind of work the team actually wants to do. The result is a firm that compounds.

"We've sharpened our ICP until it hurts. ICP squared - ideal client profile plus ideal client project. You can do a lot more volume of work that you like to do as opposed to work that you don't. It's fueled a lot of our growth."

• Write down your ICP, then sharpen it until your team genuinely groans

• Then describe the ideal client project - shape, scope, outcome

• Build the qualification process that walks away from anything outside the square

‍

4. Drink your own champagne. Then prove it.

Christian admitted that his firm hadn't really used AI internally until recently. Now KUNGFU.AI runs on Clay, HubSpot Breeze, Fireflies (with a custom sales scorecard agent), CMap as the operational backbone, and Claude Cowork stitching it together via MCP.

The result, in Christian's own words, is a 50-person firm operating like a 10,000-person one.

"I feel like we can operate as a 50-person firm and show up in the market and deliver value similar to a 10,000-person firm. Which is crazy to think about, but it's true."

• Build the tech stack you'd want to recommend to a client - but for your own firm first

• Integrate ruthlessly. Joe's data: integrated stacks correlate with higher growth and higher margin

• Start small. Christian's stack didn't materialise overnight - it was iterated

‍

5. Bad niches are real. Pick a good one.

The 'just niche down' platitude misses something obvious... which is that a lot of niches are bad.

A good niche is a problem clients can't solve for themselves, in a market with budget, where your firm can charge real day rates.

"Everyone says niche, but there's also bad niches. If you're solving a problem clients can probably solve for themselves but don't have time, or you're body-shopping, it's not going to generate large day rates."

• Test your niche against the day-rate question: what could you charge if you were the obvious choice?

• Test it against the AI question: can a client + Claude + a forward-deployed engineer do this without you?

• If both tests fail, ride a different wave - sharpen your proposition, focus on problems clients can't solve themselves

‍

Final thoughts

The session closed on a thread we kept seeing across the whole day. The firms compounding right now are doing three things at once: getting uncomfortably specific about who they sell to and what they sell, putting senior people on every meaningful piece of work, and using AI ruthlessly inside their own four walls before they ever sell it to a client.

If there's a single line to leave with, it's Joe's, when asked what the underrated weakness in most boutiques actually is:

"Going back to the basics - sales, pricing, qualification - and implementing them when you can will lead to a better firm, higher margins and a higher valuation."

AI doesn't replace the basics. It punishes anyone who hasn't done them.